Friday, December 30, 2011

James Rogers, NYAG admits to a Conflict of Interest in the NYAG Office over the Iviewit Technology Complaints and Against Andrew Cuomo and Others.

"NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN ADMISSION &; ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BY JAMES ROGERS, ESQ. IN HANDLING IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES &;

ELIOT BERNSTEIN’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST ANDREW CUOMO AND STEVEN M. COHEN.

DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION OF ANDREW CUOMO AND ELIOT SPITZER FOR VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE RULES &;

FELONY RICO CRIMES. CALL FOR NY ATTORNEY GENERAL TO CEASE ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS OF STATE SENIOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS, INCLUDING FORMER CHIEF JUDGE OF NEW YORK JUDITH KAYE IN THE IVIEWIT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL RICO AND ANTITRUST LAWSUIT, “LEGALLY RELATED” BY FEDERAL JUDGE SHIRA SCHEINDLIN TO A WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT OF CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY.

Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner Main Suspects in Patent Theft Worth Trillions.


Copies of the SIGNED and FILED LETTER to NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL @

COPIES of the CALLS @

"Re: / Phone Call on April 14, 2011 with James Rogers on behalf of Harlan Levy referred by Steven Michael Cohen, Chief of Staff to Governor Andrew Cuomo, regarding FILED Criminal Complaints against the New York Attorney General’s Office, Former Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Steven Michael Cohen, Secretary to Governor Andrew Cuomo and Monica Connell of the New York State Office of the Attorney General.

Dear Mssrs. Levy and Rogers,

Please let this letter serve as formal commemoration of our April 14, 2011 phone conversation between James Rogers, Esq., Special Counsel and Senior Advisor to Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman and myself. A witnessing party on the phone call was Patrick Hanley.

The following summarizes the salient points of the call with James Rogers, Esq., acting on behalf of Harlan Levy referred by Steven Michael Cohen, Chief of Staff to Governor Andrew Cuomo and prior calls with the Governor’s office.

Notably, Rogers acknowledged and admitted that he was precluded from handling the matters related to Iviewit’s Criminal Complaints and RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, as the Attorney General was Conflicted in the matters, as further defined herein. Admissions by Rogers of existing Conflicts of Interest now require IMMEDIATE corrective actions in ongoing State, Federal and International Criminal and Civil Proceedings going forward.

The multiple Conflicts of Interest identified, caused Rogers to assert that the inherent Conflicts for himself, the Attorney General’s Office and other members of the Attorney General’s Office, now demanded that the Attorney General’s office was required forthwith, to seek Outside Non Conflicted Independent Counsel in any related matters.

Rogers claimed that the Attorney General’s office, nor he, in any capacity, could speak to us until retaining an Independent Non-Conflicted Party to represent them. Rogers, for the first time since the Spitzer Administration in early 2000, took the correct and legal course of action on behalf of the Attorney General’s office.

Rogers calling for Independent NON CONFLICTED Counsel and a Special Prosecutor to replace the Attorney General, in the review and investigation of the Iviewit Filed Criminal Complaints and my ongoing Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, and any/all “legally related” lawsuits and proceedings, all further described herein.

I. Summary of Telephone Calls with the new york state Governor and Attorney General Offices Regarding the Criminal Complaints against the Office of the New York Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, Esq., Eliot Spitzer, Esq., Steven Michael Cohen, Esq., Monica Connell, Esq., et al. acknowledgement of conflicts of interest by the new york attorney general

William Wagener, a reporter and I, made calls to Governor Cuomo’s Office on February 08, 2011 and spoke with Emily Cole, Assistant to Steven Michael Cohen, Secretary to Governor Cuomo, regarding CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS filed against Andrew Cuomo and Steven Michael Cohen.

The CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS previously filed with both the Attorney General’s Office and the Governor’s Office on November 19, 2010 for RICO Crimes, Violations of Public Offices and more, the following URL contains a copy of the Criminal Complaint, hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein,

November 19, 2010 Andrew Cuomo, Steven Michael Cohen et al. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

On February 08, 2011, I informed Emily Cole that her work relation with Steven Michael Cohen, a named party to the Criminal Complaint, posed a Conflict of Interest in her handling any complaint information and asked to be transferred to a non-conflicted party.

 Despite the obvious Conflict created by her employment by Cohen, Emily Cole proceeded to assert that she would handle finding a non-conflicted party to review the complaints and get back to me in a few days and that she understood the conflicts with Cohen and Cuomo and would be careful to avoid further conflicts.

On April 13-14th 2011[1], seven calls were placed to Governor Cuomo’s office and Attorney General Scheinderman’s office, in order to ascertain the status of the filed Criminal Complaints. Several previous calls went unreturned over two months attempting to reach Emily Cole since the February 08, 2011 call, where she promised to get back to us in a few days. On April 13, 2011, Patrick Hanley[2] and I finally made contact with Emily Cole and requested the current status of the Criminal Complaints to determine if she had found and retained a Non-Conflicted party to investigate and review the Criminal Complaints pursuant to our prior call."
"
RICO & ANTITRUST STATE FEDERAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAWS VIOLATED, fully incorporated by reference in entirety herein.
New York State Consolidated Laws Penal
ARTICLE 200 BRIBERY INVOLVING PUBLIC SERVANTS AND RELATED OFFENSES


Above Quotes from Link Below, as well as Full Article
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=588

The Ivieiwt Technology Scandal will involve someone you know, as we all use the video technology and many investors, shareholders have been lied to about this issue for over a decade.  The iViewit Technology is said to date, to be worth 13 Trillion Dollars and still no justice for the iViewit Inventors.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.