Your Government, your "Officials" KNOW and they aid and abet Intel Corp.

Intel Monopoly Proof - Intel Cartel Proof

" Honorable Commissioners, Senators, Congressmen, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Vice President Joseph Biden:

Pursuant to Camp Marketing Consultancy ongoing Intel Network case assessment: Consumer recoverable Intel Inside transport charge, monopoly price premium, industry monopolization on Intel economic and financial analysis grows total intent to monopolize recovery, by 12%, to $88 billion.

Monopoly recovery estimate is based on two investigative tracks. First, Intel monopoly system metric applied to Intel sales revenues on manufacturing estimates of Intel microprocessor quantities, per quarter, by Micro Design Resource. Second, sorting out Intel monopoly system expenses misrepresented as legitimate costs within Intel financials.

Data analysis parallels FTC Docket 9341 time frame and covers day one on January 1, 1999 through mid 2004 on production; extending to 2006 on Intel financials.

For the purpose of optimizing in period recovery estimate, data from both investigative tracks are SEC, U.S. Senate, Congressional Committees, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys
relied.

Findings include proofs and pointers of RICO, enterprise network corruption and Sherman Act Section 1 and 2 per se condemnations of law.

Findings are submitted to FTC, U.S. DOJ Antitrust, DOJ Criminal and Consumer Fraud, New York State DOJ for follow on discovery from Intel Network.

Revision 5.1 of this briefing updates State Attorney Generals on particulars of the case matters.

Is meant by this case steward; the Relator original source, too solicit counsel for False Claims Act recovery of fraudulent and monopoly costs imposed on Federal government’s Intel microprocessor based computer purchases.

This analyst believes FCA is now proven on weight of Intel false statements to conceal. Monopoly and fraudulent costs imposed on Federal government and related GSA computer procurement claims.

Further this analyst encourages dialogue between State Attorney Generals and U.S. Attorneys for establishing a coalition to recover consumer harms, in each State, which can be calculated by the domestic ‘Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area’ subset of what is a worldwide consumer recovery value.

Make sure your State and Federal District get its actual share of the consumer recovery in relation to not calculating this amount subject to worldwide distribution.

Recover the transport charge ‘kick back’ value stolen by Intel Network, from general consumers within your State and Federal buyers within your District, and not a penny less.

To estimate the recovery in your own State House and Federal Building: 1) go to the IT Department; 2) find out how many Intel based PCs have been purchased and deployed their annually since May 1993; 3) multiply that amount by $25.50 each to determine your combined Federal Building and State House recovery values. "

Is your State Attorney FLAT out Ignoring this 18 Years of Proof? Why? Who is paying off these guys and making you pay the price ?

So what is ... "" Honorable Commissioners, Senators, Congressmen, State Attorney Generals, U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Vice President Joseph Biden"" Doing about the Intel Fraud that they Flat Out Know About? Contact them and Ask...

Source:
Document on Top of
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com