Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Philip Falcone Regarding Andrew Hamerling's Allegations. "it worked" "take it easy on the FCC" and explaining Spectrum

hrg2023@gmail.com is Philip Falcone
From: Andrew Hamerling <andrew.hamerling@jgoldman.net>
Subject: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
To: "'Crystal@CrystalCox.com'" <Crystal@CrystalCox.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 3:26 AM

Kind of a strange thing to be passionate about...saving a billionaire from losses. Yippee.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device

--- On Sun, 1/23/11, Andrew Hamerling <andrew.hamerling@jgoldman.net> wrote:

From: Andrew Hamerling <andrew.hamerling@jgoldman.net>
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
To: "'savvybroker@yahoo.com'" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 9:50 AM

No. As I understand it, Lightsquared began building out some market points of presence and suddenly TomTom GPS machines al went haywire and stopped working. This was driven from an improper clearing of the spectrum, which could really do harm to anyone the new Lightsquared essentially interferes with. Can it be overcome? Sure. Will it take lots of time and money to do it properly? Yep.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device 


From: Crystal L. Cox [mailto:savvybroker@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:45 PM
To: Andrew Hamerling
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists? 
 
I am Interested in the Model Of Corruption, how companies are blocked.. and protected such as intel - with so much proof of corruption and they are still in business, I am interested in no monopolies...

Don't you thin there is something fishy about it all?


--- On Sun, 1/23/11, Andrew Hamerling <andrew.hamerling@jgoldman.net> wrote:

From: Andrew Hamerling <andrew.hamerling@jgoldman.net>
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
To: "'savvybroker@yahoo.com'" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 10:35 AM

The satellite usage isn't the interference problem--it's the fact that they tried (and phil is desperately trying) to repurpose the spectrum for terrestrial use. Why is this significant? Because Phil knows that the spectrum would be worth 10x more minimum if it could be used for terrestrial. And the fcc wants spectrum to get utilized, so they were all for it--and knew there would be interference--but to what degree no one knew...until now.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device 


From: Crystal L. Cox [mailto:savvybroker@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 01:20 PM
To: Andrew Hamerling
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists? 
 

So You believe that the FCC initially gave permission thinking all was well and that New information has come to light the Interference is bad, even possibly dangerous and so they need to correct this as it could affect the Dept. of Defense and Private Individuals...

Who is to blame for NOT looking at this Closer before the Satellite went up? 

Is there real proof of the "improper clearing of the spectrum" ?

Why did this TomTom GPS thing surface After the Market Points? In your opionion.. ?



--- On Sun, 1/23/11, hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com> wrote:

From: hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
To: "Crystal L. Cox" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 4:01 PM

You can tell him that the interference issue is very overblown that we have done testing for two years. The gps guys have not though and are shooting first and asking questions later.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 23, 2011, at 6:35 PM, "Crystal L. Cox" <savvybroker@yahoo.com> wrote:

ANDREW HAMERLING Correspondence Today. 



--- On Sun, 1/23/11, hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com> wrote:

From: hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: So why do you care whether lighsquared exists?
To: "Crystal L. Cox" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 8:31 PM

I finally saw your comments! I had the alert on the wrong info... Duh...they are great...one point, The fcc is on our side so be nice to them :) we can lay low now and see what comes up...

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 23, 2011, at 9:33 PM, "Crystal L. Cox" <savvybroker@yahoo.com> wrote:
he has been a telecommunication analyst for years.. you WIN he loses, my guess.. So his interest is in making me discredit you.. when you google him. .and read what he says on blogs and quoted in articles.. he must be heavily invested in the "other guys" so the Truth is not what he is after.. 

i would love to post any information on those GPS tests.. I am still researching dif. things.. hope your evening is good.. 

take care



On Jan 23, 2011, at 11:57 PM, "Crystal L. Cox" <savvybroker@yahoo.com> wrote:

Yes but dont ya think that NTIA folks are really the same thing as the FCC and that maybe the FCC is humoring someone.. I mean they stand in your way right.. ?

making sure they are not getting paid off with a little jabber cant hurt right?  ok i will let up.. 

From: "hrg2023@gmail.com"
To: Crystal L. Cox  
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: A few requests please....thx

 It all worked out great! 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 25, 2011, at 10:08 PM, "Crystal L. Cox" <savvybroker@yahoo.com> wrote:
I think I Took Care of It.. 

There was a Zillion more connections I was going to Make.. 



--- On Sun, 1/23/11, hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com> wrote:

From: hrg2023@gmail.com <hrg2023@gmail.com>
Subject: A few requests please....thx
To: "Crystal L. Cox" <savvybroker@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, January 23, 2011, 11:02 PM

Can we remove this part of the article of the most recent article and the full article about intel and the CEO. It will tone it down a bit... 

"seems like Clearwire may be controlling the FCC whom is Suppose to answer to congress, who is suppose to answer to you. If Lightsquared gets their Fair Chance, Consumer Costs Could go down... Competition is a a Good thing RIght? And the FCC is Supposed to "Enforce" the Communications act and enforce non-discrimination Right? So what Connects Clearwire Corp. To members of the FCC - the Department of Commerce? More on that Coming Soon."


Also like to remove the following entire piece:


SUNDAY, JANUARY 23, 2011

LightSquared initially received FCC Permission - Why the Change of Thinking?

"LightSquared initially received FCC Permission to use its satellite frequencies to deploy a dual-mode satellite-long term evolution (LTE) network, but another government agency has since stepped in its path."

The FCC, Federal Communications Commission, who is supposedly an independent US government agency, directly responsible to Congress

Who at the FCC Screwed this up?

Who at the FCC is connected to Verizon, Clearwire Corporation, or AT&T?

Who at the FCC would just simply let Lightsquared have "permission" if it was not actually something that was researched thoroughly BEFORE the Launch of a Satellite and before Irresponsibly risking Billions of Dollars of Investors, as this Money is NOW gone in some way... as it is certainly NOT Cheap to "Launch a Satellite" AND the Money that the LightsquaredHarbinger Capital Partners have put intoLightsquared based on this initial "FCC Permission" - well I say that the FCC, their Insurance Carrier or Individuals who Screwed Up ARE financially Liable for Billions on Top of Billions of Investors Money. For they would not have went this far if they did not initially have FCC permission, so What Happened?

So the FCC who answers to Congress and "The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable. " AND yet they did not do their "homework" before giving "permissions" for investors to SPEND Billions. What does the SEC thing of This? Or do they even care that the FCC has disregarded the Rights of Investors by NOT doing the proper leg work first...

The FCC give "Permission" and then when your ALL in, well then ANOTHER Government Agency Steps in and makes up some mumbo jumbo to STOP the Progression of Lightsquared, why? What is the Real Motive? I say it is Pay Offs, Favors Owed... it is Saving Old Money - Saving the Good Ol' Boys - SavingVerizon, Clearwire Corporation, and AT&T. For as soon as Lightsquared gets a foothold, wellVerizon, Clearwire Corporation, and AT&T are No More... they Stand to Lose everything Over Some "new guy" - Philip Falcone with the Moxy to dare to go against them and to dare believe that we actually have a Free market place, when Really we have ... Big MONEY.. Political Pull controlling Government Agencies is what we have. Judges are Bought Off, the SEC has insiders that are Corrupt and land big jobs later such as the Peter Sivere whistle blower case where he exposed over 300 Million in Fraud by JP Morgan and then SEC Investigator, George Demos protected JP Morgan, Exposed and Endangered the Whistleblowerwho then got fired... Click Here for That Story.

So Verizon, Clearwire Corporation, and AT&T... along with Goldman Sachs, and Several Government Agencies - Individuals in those Agencies will be named and exposed soon... (Got a Tip?Crystal@CrystalCox.com ) - they ALL are putting up any Road Block they can thing of to FraudulentlySquash LIghtsquared, NOW after Billions have already been invested. They are all making a HUGE deal out of every dollar that Harbinger Capital PartnersLightsquared takes in or LOSES.. it seems thatVerizon, Clearwire Corporation, and AT&T... along with Goldman Sachs are controlling the Mainstream media also to put fear into the investors minds..

All this to STOP Free Enterprise, to Control the Flow of Money, and ALL this is Illegal.. Time for a Federal RICO Lawsuit, a Whistleblower Lawsuit, and mass Criminal Complaints as this is Violating Federal Laws and well.. .. the Government and Government Agents SHOULD not be Above the Law and Certainly the Executive at Verizon,Clearwire Corporation, AT&T and Goldman Sachs SHOULD not be above the Law...

So SHOULD Lightsquared, Harbinger Capitol Investors SUE the FCC? I think they SHOULD, unless of Course the FCC did their homework and the ... is Simply trying to STOP Lightsquard for their own "Motives" or "Special Interest"

Did the the National Telecommunications and Information Association (NTIA) discuss this initial "permission" with the FCC

Got a Inside Tip on the CEO's at Verizon, Clearwire Corporation, AT&T and Goldman Sachs as to what they have done to bribe anyone, cover up any crimes, pull favors in, or give favors.. anything they have DONE to interfere with Free Enterprise as a New "Business" tries to Fairly Compete with them in an Extremely Unfair Marketplace?

eMail your Tip to me
Crystal L. Cox

About the FCC

Lots more on ALL this Coming Soon.. Talk about a Mess.. and a Blatant Wall of Corruption to STOP a New Business that might just save us all some BIG Money, as for Me Personally ... Competition with VERIZON is a Good thing.. they dominant to much, charge to much... lock you to contracts constantly.. and Competition is a GOOD THING..
More on this Story




Thx, your the best...!!!!!



Sent from my iPad

===================================================

I, Investigative Blogger had posted lots of information connecting the Intel CEO and the FCC and all kinds of connections and Philip Falcone called me in the middle of the night to insist that I take it easy on the FCC, and asked me to change my blog posts, and then says it worked.

Obviously years later Verizon and Clearwire over topped Lightsquared and at the HARM and COST of the Wireless Consumer. All these Billionaires in negotiations that end up hurting the consumers. Lightsquared Lost Billions. Deer and Company, Verizon, Clearwire and more are connected to Senator Grassley who pretty much STOPPED Lightsquared which would have been good for consumers. Grassley is connected to WR Grace who is the DEVIL himself, and is NOT a good guy. In the End Lightsquared was ran out and the Consumers pay a huge price in MANY ways.

However, what was Philip Falcone up to with the FCC, who was his connection, what worked to pressure who, as there was preliminary approval. This led to more investor money, 100's of millions more I believe. So what is the real story? Got a Tip?  SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

More Coming Soon

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.