You are Either Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution. ~ the Truth is Criminal it Seems. This is a Blog that is the Truth to Me.. Fact or Fiction for You, Read the Information, Talk to Insiders, Read Documents Form your own Opinion. What is Your Opinion of 1+1= 2? Note if you want "Information" on this blog changed, email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com - I will "Consider" it. ~~ All Citizen Journalists, Start a Blog, Send Me a Link. ~ Write on my blogs and get your story found.
Kamala Harris - a Hero of the Mortgage Crisis - Demand Transparency and Accountability with Banks in the Mortgage Crisis
California Refuses to Accept Obama’s Banking Sellout
Thursday 10 November 2011
by: Robert Scheer, Truthdig | News Analysis
California Attorney General Kamala Harris says that she refuses to release banks from legal liability for the mortgage crisis. (Photo: Obama For America - California)
There is no three-strikes law for crooked bankers, not even a law for a fifth strike, as The New York Times reported in the case of Citigroup, cited last month in a $1 billion fraud case. Unlike the California third-striker I once wrote about whom a district attorney wanted banished forever to state prison for stealing a piece of pizza from the plate of a person dining outdoors, Citigroup executives get off with a fine and by offering a promise not to do it again, and again and again.
As the Times reported when Citigroup agreed to settle SEC charges last month: “Citigroup’s main brokerage subsidiary, its predecessors or its parent company agreed to not violate the very same antifraud statue in July 2010. And in May 2006. Also as far back as March 2005 and April 2000.”
Not that the bankers face prison time, since the Justice Department has refused to act in these cases, and the Securities and Exchange Commission is bringing only civil charges, which the banks find quite tolerable. This time, the fine against Citigroup was $285 million, which may sound like a lot except that the bank raked off as much as $700 million on this particular toxic securities deal. As the Bloomberg news service editorialized, “... there should be only one answer from Jed S. Rakoff, the federal judge in New York assigned to weigh the merits of the agreement: You’ve got to be kidding.”