A year later, the defendant submitted the same motion for renewal and reargument stating they have new evidence, my deposition.
In the deposition, I stated the exact same facts, this time Nicolai granted the motion stating Steve Rose and his company are not the same and are different. The company paid the $1M and dismissed the mortgages, and gave a $1M windfall to the defendant.
What adds to this is the judge presiding over the case is Judge Lefkowitz , not Nicolai. Lefkowitz previously ruled in the same case, different matter, since I used a company credit card for payments for a web site, we were the same, me and the company.