"The First Amendment requires neither tact nor politeness. It requires that we permit all views to set up stalls in the marketplace of ideas, and we let that marketplace decide which ideas prevail."
Marc Randazza is pretending to be Subpoenaed by David Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm.
However Marc Randazza really offered himself up to be Deposed AGAINST blogger Crystal Cox.
Marc Randazza has done this to punish blogger Crystal Cox, or in Marc Randazza's words make an "enemy" of me. See Blogger Crystal L. Cox, ME bought Marc Randazza .com, and domain name attorney, all for free speech and First Amendment Rights Allegedly, WELL Marc Randazza got SO Pissed off that he contacted the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox, which is one of the BIGGEST, most Important First Amendment Legal Case ever to hit the Blogsphere... Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff's who sued me, and offered to negotiate for me, that was in December. Marc Randazza, then acted as if Marc Randazza represented Blogger Crystal Cox, and yet Marc Randazza did not let me, the potential client know and I had been interviewing other First Amendment Attorneys.
Only to find out from them that Marc Randazza was claiming to represent me and that Marc Randazza had even contacted the Plaintiff's Attorney, David Amen of Tonkon Torp Law Firm BEHIND MY BACK, disclosing my strategy and personal information to the ENEMY. Without my Permission after he spoke with me interviewing to be my Attorney, and me interviewing to be his client.
Marc Randazza said he would get back to me, Marc Randazza did not get back to me until I had to email Marc Randazza and let him know that is was NOT Ok to tell other Attorneys or anyone for that matter that Marc Randazza represented me, Blogger Crystal Cox, because Marc Randazza had made no deal with me. Marc Randazza only extracted information and used it against me.
Then I emailed Marc Randazza to tell him why I did not choose him and he wished me luck. Months later I asked Marc Randazza if knew anyone that would be interested in hiring me for PR, as I had been evicted and was penniless and needed a job. Marc Randazza told me he would not hire me, because I was unEthical, See Marc Randazza was really PISSED OFF because I was smart enough to buy Marc Randazza .com and Jackass Marc Randazza was not. So in his rage Marc J. Randazza has sought revenge by STOMPING on the First Amendment Rights of all and interfering further into the Obsidian V. Cox case ( ya Know the One that I CHOSE not TO Let Arrogant, Disrespectful Asshole Marc Randazza Represent me in), Well Marc Randazza got in the middle of it anyway and ON The Wrong side of the Law, WRONG side of those "Ethics" Mr. Hypocrite Marc Randazza is all BIG about and Seriously on the WRONG Side of Bloggers Rights and the First Amendment.
Believe Me Tact and Politeness is the Last thing that Marc Randazza deserves from me or anyone else for that matter. Marc Randazza disrespected me. Marc Randazza is working to Censor Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox.
Marc Randazza ran over my rights and Marc Randazza DOES not fight for the First Amendment for All, Marc Randazza fights for the First Amendment that gets Media Whore Marc Randazza the most attention for his Special EGO Trip.
Posted Here by Crystal Cox, Investigative Blogger,
otherwise known as the Unhinged Blogger, Crazy Crystal Cox, Mad Dog Blogger Crystal Cox,
oh and my Favorite "Enemy" of Marc Randazza.
"Butthurt is not Defamation. Butthurt is Butthurt, and you don't get paid for that in the United States of America. Not on my watch." ~ Marc J. Randazza
WOW, Shocking words from a man who is So "Butthurt" that Blogger Crystal Cox rejected him as her attorney, even if it was for FREE, that he turned on me, threatened to make me his ENEMY and then Sided with the Plaintiff out to Suppress Free Speech for All Bloggers who Do What I Do.
Marc Randazza is So "BUTTHURT" that Blogger Crystal Cox, ME bought Marc Randazza .com, that Marc Randazza is willing to sacrafice Free Speech for All in Siding with the EVIL Plaintiff in Obsidian Finance Group V. Pro Se Blogger Crystal Cox.
Marc Randazza has Double Standards on Top of top
of Double Standards.
Marc Randazz is pissed off at Blogger Crystal Cox because I bought Marc Randazza .com, and so he wants "Paid" for "Being Butthurt". And YES in the United States.
Marc Randazza wanted me to give him the Domain Name MarcRandazza.com that he was to DUMB to Buy, this is essentially wanted PAID for being "Butthurt", Right?
By giving him something that did NOT belong to him, so that he would not make me an Enemy. That was his THREAT. So Because I chose to NOT cower to Marc Randazza's Threats, Marc Randazza has contacted the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox and offered to give "testimony", a Deposition, in Effort to Help the Plaintiff Steal Domain Names that I use to make a Living and to flat out SEIZE Marc Randazza .com, which I bought after the $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement Against Me.
Marc Randazza is "BUTTHURT" and "Whiny" because Internet Savvy Crystal Cox Blogger was smarter then Marc Randazza, Alleged First Amendment Attorney, but only when it comes to things other then Marc Randazza's Butthurt EGO.
Marc Randazza is really a "Media Whore" and where there looks to be a high profile Freedom of Speech Case there is Marc Randazza Yammering some Gibberish and pretending it is in the name of Free Speech and the First Amendment. However, NOT when it comes to the Free Speech of Citizen Journalists and Anti-Corruption Bloggers such as Crystal Cox.
Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" is now defending Rush Limbaugh, and pretending it is in the name of Free Speech, while at the same time in secret talks to STOMP on the First Amendment in Obsidian Vs. Cox.
Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" is Yapping on the Rush Limbaugh calling a Woman a Slut and Prostitute Case, because Marc Randazza, "Media Whore" wants attention on him as a celebrity First Amendment Attorney. Thing is that does not mean that Marc Randazza is really for the First Amendment, Free Speech and Constitutional Rights of ALL. FOR Marc Randazza is Not For the Constitutional Rights of Female Blogger Clients such as Me, who DEMAND to be treated with RESPECT, or I will not even let HIM work FOR ME for FREE. There are more important things then MONEY. I have worked for over 6 years, and put my life, ever cent, and gave up everything I knew as my life to Fight for These Victims and I Will Be Damned if I will Let Some, Pompous Arrogant Attorney sit me in the corner and shut me up.
Marc Randazza, "Media Whore", interjecting is Two Cents on the Rush Limbaugh Rant, is simply to drum up business, because he won a case or two, but has sense spent that money and NOW needs to get his nose into High Profile Free Speech Cases to get another Gig. Marc Randazza is NOT Do Gooder for the the Freedom of Speech for All.
Marc Randazza told Blogger Crystal Cox, "you really want to make an enemy of me" and all I, Blogger Crystal Cox, did was Reject Marc Randazza as my attorney because he was pompous, arrogant, self assuming and treated me as if I have no brain. AND I bought a Domain Name that Internet Genius, Domain Name Arbitration Expert, and Alleged Internet Legal Super Star Marc Randazza was to Slow on the Draw to Buy.
Marc Randazza brags that he is the first one that people call in a defamation suit, thing is that is because those people found Marc Randazza in the search engines. Yet Marc Randazza did not have the brains to buy Marc Randazza .com, so now Marc Randazza is butt hurt and working with Obsidian Finance Group and Tonkon Torp Law Firm whom single handidly STOMPED on the First Amendment Rights of ALL.
Got a Tip on First Amendment SCUM Lawyer Marc Randazza?
Email me at SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com OR
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com
Posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Update: Corrupt attorney Marc Randazza believes that he “seek[s] to preserve the First Amendment and ensure the right to free speech, however small or persecuted the speaker.” However, he is more than willing to hide behind European privacy laws in order to protect himself from free speech.
The site CorruptRandazza.com has exposed today a threatening letter sent, in a seemingly “discreet” fashion, to an English publisher who had published pieces by journalists about the corruption. In the letter, the “free speech defender” Randazza wants pieces about him taken down.
Marc Randazza hired an English law firm known as “Cohen Davis Solicitors” to shamelessly (and frivolously) take down multiple legitimate opinion articles with “NOT FOR PUBLICATION” plastered at the head of the letter. The warning was probably given in the hope that the letter will not be made public.
The articles Randazza wants deleted expose his past, including the many bar complaints and court rulings.
The opinion of the writer agrees with many others and the opinion of probably the majority of those in the legal profession that attorney Marc Randazza is corrupt.
Even judges said, hinted, or wrote that “tainted” Marc Randazza is corrupt, at the very least.
Who Is Attorney Marc Randazza (Randazza Legal Group)?
Marc Randazzais a “tainted” attorney who wasn’t good enough to represent even the InfoWars founder and conspiracy theorist, Alex Jones. Major news publications took issue with Randazza’s unique approach to the law, especially when it came to his dealings with pornography and notorious alt-right figures and neo-Nazis.
Randazza will try to argue that he is not corrupt. “The allegation of him being corrupt is pure fabrication,” states the letter. The Merriam Webster definition of corrupt is “dishonest or illegal behavior.” By saying that Randazza is corrupt, no one is accusing him of a crime, necessarily. They are simply saying that he is dishonest.
In a letter sent to a publisher, Randazza’s attorneys threatened to sue the company for defamation. However, almost nowhere in the letter were any of the facts published in the pieces disputed. Instead, it simply quotes large portions of text without saying why they were defamatory.
Here are the links that Randazza believes are defamatory. However, he has not proven them in court as defamation. It is up to the reader to decide whether or not these stories are true.
Randazza also claims that pieces published by Ars Technica are part of the defamation, but these pieces were not proven in an American court to be defamatory. At best, all the accusations are simply unproven claims.
Dwight Schar’s Attorney Randazza Manipulates The Truth
Randazza selected two pieces from the linked stories and claimed they were defamatory to him. He also tried to state that by linking to these stories, publishers were responsible for the content of the links.
There is no record anywhere of Randazza initiating a lawsuit against HuffPost or Ars Technica. There is also no record of HuffPost or Ars Technica settling with Marc Randazza outside of court. And of course, there is no record of Randazza winning a lawsuit against either of these media outlets.
Randazza must think he is the judge and jury in the United States, randomly assuming that pieces published in major publications as fact are defamation and false. The legal definition of defamation is “the act of making untrue statements about another which damages his/her reputation.” In order for Randazza to say that something is defamation, he must prove it to be untrue. Nowhere in the document does he do so.
Randazza’s Definition of “Corrupt” is…. Corrupted
Instead, Randazza argues that he is “not corrupt or dishonest.” The letter stated, “He has not guilty of ‘serious misconduct’ in his legal practice.” [sic].
“The allegation of him being corrupt is pure fabrication,” states the letter. The Merriam Webster definition of corrupt is “dishonest or illegal behavior.” By saying that Randazza is corrupt, no one is accusing him of a crime, necessarily. They are simply saying that he is dishonest.
Randazza was issued a public reprimand by The Florida Bar on Sept. 3, 2020 DISCIPLINE CASE #201500718 against Marc Randazza. The reprimand was related to his ethical violations in Nevada, where Randazza, as a porn attorney, was sued by the State Bar of Nevada on nine charges of violations.
On January 14, 2019, the Arizona State Bar issued a public reprimand and a suspension based upon some of the misconduct that took place in Nevada. A new disciplinary case was opened in Arizona and California based upon further information and documentation of alleged misconduct by Randazza, to include allegedly lying in court documents related to the Alex Jones case in Connecticut. However, beyond the reciprocal disciplinary proceedings, Randazza was not charged with any new violations and the Arizona suspension was not put into effect.
On May 2, 2019, in the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County, Massachusetts, in a state bar disciplinary proceeding styled In re: Mark John Randazza, Case No. BD-2018-110, a hearing was conducted, which included an additional alleged ethical violation that the bar counsel claimed the State Bar of Nevada ignored. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court did not find this additional ethical violation existed and issued a stayed suspension of the same term as Nevada. The Florida Supreme Court conducted a similar reciprocal disciplinary proceeding; it found no aggravating factors, with the Referee finding that there was “no clear and convincing evidence to suggest that anything [Randazza] may have done on behalf of his other clients was actually adverse to” his complaining clients. Thus, Randazza was given a reprimand and one year probation in Florida.
The Truth
The State Bar of Nevada charged Randazza for violating Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct on nine counts. He broke the rules in regards to:
Communication,
Conflict of Interest: Current Clients,
Conflict of Interest: Current Clients: Specific Rules,
Imputation of Conflicts of Interest,
Safekeeping Property,
Declining or Terminating Representation, Advisor,
Restrictions on Right to Practice,
Misconduct.
Randazza two-timed his clients, who were pornographers, by working for other clients, who were also pornographers. He “solicited illicit payoffs,” said HuffPost. In 2010, Randazza tried to bribe a website so that he wouldn’t sue them, again. This solicitation was a violation of the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct.
The State Bar of Nevada sued for the suspension of Randazza’s license in 2018 with violations of ethics. His license was suspended for a year. However, the State Bar did not put the suspension into effect.
Randazza actually pleaded guilty to two violations: a bribe and a shady loan. He appealed his suspension to the Nevada Supreme Court, but was rejected.
Randazza Had To Be Fired Even By InfoWars’ Alex Jones
HuffPost writes that “outrageous” Randazza is “curiously chummy” with fascists and racists. Randazza has also represented several Neo-Nazis in court, including Andrew Anglin, who published the address of a Jewish realtor on the Nazi website The Daily Stormer.
But “rude” Randazza was so bad that even conspiracy theorist Alex Jones had to fire him. The InfoWars founder was told by a Connecticut judge that Randazza was “tainted.” The same judge accused Randazza of “serious misconduct.” In addition, Randazza lied while filing claims for Jones in the state of Connecticut, where he was not licensed to practice.
Attorney Marc Randazza, who was fired by InfoWars’ Alex Jones because a Connecticut judge accused him of “serious misconduct.” But he is Ryan Homes and NVR Inc., founder Dwight Schar’s attorney. Dwight Schar also chose a corrupt Marc Randazza to represent his Bella Collina in Florida.
One would think that Dwight Schar would have an issue with an attorney representing porn, neo-Nazis, with multiple state bar disciplinary proceedings and one that has one of the largest bags of legal scandals on the web. Does Dwight Schar pay Randazza for the dirty fight, frivolous lawsuits, lying or bending the law and then picking up the tab for the consequences?
Disclaimer: This article is merely the opinion of the writer and not that of the publication or any other official authority. There are points to think about and you should be doing your homework based on any other facts you may choose including checking court records, other sites and interviewing Randazza himself for his comments.
Tags: Corrupt Attorney Marc Randazza, Dwight Schar, Attorney Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group, Cohen Davis Solicitors
